White Person or White Supremacist (Racist)?

[Edward Williams]

A white male once told me...and he wrote it on paper and signed it...he functions as a white person when he "mistreats a non-white person or witnesses a non-white person being mistreated".

I thought about this for a long time and asked myself if this person is functioning as a white person or a white supremacist (racist). Once I asked myself that question it became clear. The presumption is white people do this all the time and that is the reason any white person that is able to practice white supremacy (racism), in a SYSTEM of white supremacy (racism), is a racist suspect.

Also note that he didn't say he functions as a white person when he "mistreats a non-white person or witnesses a non-white person being mistreated by a white person.". Oh no...he said...and I quote...he functions as a white person when he "mistreats a non-white person or witnesses a non-white person being mistreated". This alone indicates he is aware that white people, collectively speaking, are more POWERFUL than non-white people, and can...at anytime...stop non-white people from mistreating each other.
_________________
What is the reason YOU were born into a SYSTEM of INJUSTICE if not to replace it with a SYSTEM of JUSTICE?

[Dan Freeman]

This is what I don't understand when I see non white people attemting to come up with other terms to describe a Racist suspects.

"Racial Sympathizer"

"White Asset"

"Counter Racist White person"

"Human"

People, all that shit is confusing.

Using Counter Racist Logic, the catogories for white people are as follows:

Racists/White Supremacists

Racist Suspects.

Why give them any more room to run?

smallz
_________________
Understanding is honoring the truth beneath the surface.

[mel]

Smallz,

I agree. The terms non-white, suspect white & racist white supremacist are the most reliable terms we non-whites have to use in counter racist science. White people know that words are weapons. When you are at war you don't have time to use a million different weapons to defend yourself. I've found that in using these terms & LOGIC reveals truth so severely that they leave suspect white people (and some non-whites) stunned, with only a heap of words to cover their wounds.
_________________
RWSWJ

[Josh]

The following is a quote from David Duke where he attempts to explain why he is NOT a White supremacist. He suggests 4 alternative terms such as:

White separatist

White self-determinationist

White heritage advocate

White preservationist


Check out what he says:




"I'll give you an example. There was an article recently on myself and on the convention, and they referred to me and to the people coming to the conference as "White supremacists." That's a term that Jewish supremacists have coined to label any [racially conscious] White person.

I am not a "White supremacist" and I know that you're not,


because 'supremacy' means that you want to rule over other people. And none of us, none of the real thinkers and leaders of this movement are "White supremacists." We don't want to be 'supreme' over others. We simply want our own. Maybe White separatist would be a better term. Or simply White self-determinationist. Or White heritage advocate. Or White preservationist.

But "White supremacist" is not what we are.

We're not trying to rule over Blacks or Jews or Mexicans or any other group. We simply want our own communities, our own society, to reflect that of our forefathers -- what every other race on this planet wants. If we're "White supremacists," then the Japanese are "Japanese supremacists" and the Indians are "Indian supremacists." We are simply White preservationists who believe that we have a right to preserve our heritage, our culture, our freedom, our land, and our values. "


David Duke is an interesting racist suspect because he constantly experiments with language to find better ways to get things done. Im sure you could find past speeches, films and interviews inwhich he expresses support for the practice of White supremacy. But he has refined his approach and now no longer refers to himself or what he does using the term White supremacy.

Also,

He has learned to "hide" the discussion of White peoples greatest fear (loss of ability to practice racism White supremacy) behind a collection of vague undefined terms ; check him out:

"we have a right to preserve our heritage, our culture, our freedom, our land, and our values. "


our

our

our

our

What does he have that he is really fearful of losing?

But most importantly, what does he hafta DO to maintain it?

Follow the logic.

What does a "White separatist" have to DO to be a White separatist?

How separate is separate?

Separate highways?

Separate sewage systems?

Separate telephone lines?

Separate air?


Follow the logic and think about the power dynamic necessary to BE a "White separatist".

Josh

[Edward Williams]

[Dan Freeman]

[Edward Williams]

If a person classifies themselves as white and have been classified as white, is accepted as white by other people classified as white...that is as far as a non-white person can go because under the SYSTEM of white supremacy (racism) non-white people can't prove, beyond a shadow of doubt, what a white person says and/or does to be a white person (function) or what a white supremacist (racist) says and/or does to be a white supremacist (racist) - (function).

This is the reason it is necessary for any non-white person to suspect any white person they think is able to be a white supremacist (racist) is a racist suspect.
_________________
What is the reason YOU were born into a SYSTEM of INJUSTICE if not to replace it with a SYSTEM of JUSTICE?

[Dan Freeman]

"Not all White people are Racists, but all Racists are White people."

--Neely Fuller Jr.
_________________
Understanding is honoring the truth beneath the surface.