Maximum Emergency Compensatory Justice (MECJ)

[Edward Williams]

Has anyone done any in-depth reading on WAR/COUNTER-WAR in the UICCSC? It is very interesting, conceptually speaking. This concept, as explained in the UICCSC, is carefully thought out. It has what to do and what not to do...what to say and what not to say. Pages 207-233.

Taking a look at each aspect of MECJ I do not see this practice currently on the planet.

Maximum Emergency Compensatory Justice is described as:

The willful and deliberate elimination of one or more Racists (White Supremacists), through death, and, the willful and deliberate elimination of self, through death, by a Victim of Racism (non-white person), acting alone, acting according to a detailed plan, and acting only after he or she had judged that he or she can no longer endure the effects of Racism and/or that he or she is no longer able to effectively promote justice, except by eliminating one or more Racists, and by eliminating his or her self, as a subject to the Racists.

I will use this thread to outline MECJ and attempt to refine MECJ. Can anyone think of any aspects that MECJ should have in it?
_________________
What is the reason YOU were born into a SYSTEM of INJUSTICE if not to replace it with a SYSTEM of JUSTICE?

[Edward Williams]

Here is one of the aspects of MECJ:

Don't enact Maximum Emergency Compensatory Justice during periods of great destruction caused by "natural" forces ["God", "The Creator", etc.]

Examples:

Disease Epidemic, Earthquake, Fire Storm, Tornado, Flood, Hurricane, Famine, etc.

Reason(s):

It is unjust and incorrect for a victim of racism (white supremacy) to commit any act against any person when that person is injured or being killed by "natural" forces, and/or, when that person is experiencing suffering as a result of these forces.

It is just and correct for all persons to try to help eliminate suffering during periods of famine, flood, epidemic, etc.
_________________
What is the reason YOU were born into a SYSTEM of INJUSTICE if not to replace it with a SYSTEM of JUSTICE?

[Josh]

Ive read the 9th chapter of the UICCSC (war/counter-war). I had to take it a couple of pages at a time due to the extreme consequences of the actions described.

One aspect that struck a chord with me the first time I read it and still does, is this passage on pg 233 that demonstrates the logic of why you must also end your own life to complete an act of Maximum Emerjency Compensatory Justice:

Maximum-Emergency Compensatory Justice is the most "honest" method of using counter-violence to express very quickly and effectively, the concept that the use of violence by one person against another for unjust reasons, or objectives, must result in "waste" for both rather than "profit" for either


In other words, MECJ is not something done to create a "better life for you". The only thing Im sure it creates is a balance between the participants of the event.

Otherwise it ain't MECJ.

Im not even sure MECJ is provable.

But its an interesting concept.

Josh

[Edward Williams]

[Edward Williams]

Can a white person enact Maximum-Emergency Compensatory Justice?

If so, how?

If not, why not?
_________________
What is the reason YOU were born into a SYSTEM of INJUSTICE if not to replace it with a SYSTEM of JUSTICE?

[Non-White Male]

Do not discuss Maximum-Emergency Compensatory Justice except to decribe what it is, and/or, what it is not.

Do not discuss any specific enactment of Maximum-Emergency Compensatory Justice, nor any act, by anyone, at any time, that seemed to be an enactment of Maximum-Emergency Compensatory Justice.

Reason(s)/Explanation(s):

The only person who is justified in calling a specific act of Maximum-Emergency Compensatory Justice by the title "Maximum-Emergency Compensatory Justice" is the person who enacts it.

Since the person who enacts Maximum-Emergency Compensatory Justice will have ceased to exist (as part of the enactment), no other person is "qualified" to make accurate statements as to whether Maximum-Emergency Compensatory Justice was enacted, or was not enacted.

Whereas other persons can describe what they saw happen, it is incorrect for them to say that they know, for certain, that what they saw was an enactment of Maximum-Emergency Compensatory Justice. In answer to a specific question as to whether a specific act was, or was not, remarks should always be: "I don't know".

From" The United Independent Compensatory Code/System/Concept"
a textbook/workbook for thought,speech and/or action for victims of racism(white supremacy) page 217.

[Edward Williams]

[copious]

By BEING a white person one should have to ever commint MECJ. Why? Because that white person can be much more effective to non-white people by simply revealing truth on how the system of RWS function and how to counter it.


Why should the most capable people remove themselves from the solution, if the solution is truley what they seek?


cope

[Edward Williams]

[Josh]

I agree with the logic copious stated AND I say a White person Cannot ennact MECJ because from jump street they are not a victim of racism White supremacy.


It is something else.

Josh

[Edward Williams]

[Josh]

What is so special about being a victim of white supremacy (racism) that only non-white people can kill suspected white supremacists (racists) and then kill themselves and only then will it be called MECJ?--VGOD


I would call it a type of VGQ (victims guarrenteed qualification) except instead of speech its action.

Everytime I see Micheal Jackson I hafta bite my tongue; that was HIS response to racism White supremacy. While I don't agree with it, I understand it.

You can do some testing but you really hafta take the word of cancer patients that marijauna minimizes nausea from chemotherapy, after all, they do have the
victims guarrenteed qualification.


Until you get cancer, they are the best judges of what cancer feels like and what substances relieve the symptoms.

Josh

[Edward Williams]

[copious]

Amen:

I was responding to your question but my response lead to another question. Please, refer back to my question because in my mind those who are suspect victimizers have the responsability to help all the victims that they can by revealing truth.

cope

[Edward Williams]